Monday, October 27, 2008
...and there are lawyers out there who studied the Constitution from this guy
“To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf…” Noted Constitutional Scholar - 2001
"Don't mock the Constitution. Don't make fun of it. Don't suggest that it's not American to abide by what the founding fathers set up. It's worked pretty well for over 200 years." Same Noted Constitutional Scholar - September 2008
But please don’t try this kind of legal reasoning at home…unless, of course, you went to Harvard.
"Don't mock the Constitution. Don't make fun of it. Don't suggest that it's not American to abide by what the founding fathers set up. It's worked pretty well for over 200 years." Same Noted Constitutional Scholar - September 2008
But please don’t try this kind of legal reasoning at home…unless, of course, you went to Harvard.
